Showing posts with label security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label security. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Web Host Netregistry Hit by DDoS Attack


WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) --Australian web host NetRegistry (www.netregistry.au) was hit by a DDoS attack on Monday, according to a report by ZDNet Australia.
This attack comes a few months after it acquired the customers and assets of Australian web host Distribute.IT, the web host attacked by hacker group Evil in June.
According to the report, the attack started at 10:30 am and affected its customers using shared and virtual private server hosting. Approximately 100,000 customers were likely to have been affected by the disruption, according to Netregistry CEO Brett Fenton.
Fenton says Netregistry itself was not the intended target, but it isn't sure which hosting customer the attack was directed at. According to the report, Netregistry had to fend off a similar DDoS attack last year when its customer the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft was targeted by Anonymous.
Around 10:45 am, Netregistry announced its phone system was overloaded and had to place a limit on the number of calls it could accept. Around this time, the company confirmed it was experiencing a DDoS attack, and began to re-divert its network bandwidth and work with its upstream provider Telstra to stem the flow of traffic.
A report by iTechReport says that by lunchtime, the company believed it had resolved the issue, but the attack restarted around 2pm bringing the hosted sites offline again.
Netregistry says by 5pm access had been restored for most customers except for those using a Telstra-provided internet connection. Access to sites on the Zeus Dynamic shared hosting infrastructure remains offline, according to the report.
The report says the outage impacted its resellers and subsidiaries like ZipHosting as well.

http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/092611_Web_Host_Netregistry_Hit_by_DDoS_Attack

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Identifying the hacktivists of the emerging cyberwar

The hacktivist landscape has become increasingly cluttered, and while the anonymity they cling to makes clearly labeling each player difficult, the rising division between these groups is beginning to give them distinct identities.
The Internet has never been a safe place, and since its inception, and introduction to consumers, privacy and security have been a major concern. Of course, now that the average person’s computer skills are many times over what they used to be, that only amplifies the problem. Couple this with the fact that millions and millions of people are uploading mass amounts of personal and sensitive data and you’ve got a recipe for some serious cyber-insecurity. The advent of hackers with a conscience has exacerbated the situation while also putting a new twist on Web ethics.
Anonymous and LulzSec have become household names, and their Internet antics have captured the attention of just about everyone, including the CIA. But as identities and opponents merge, the cyberwar landscape has become confusing. Consider this an introductory course to the who’s who of hackers.

Anonymous

Anonymous first largely appeared on many radars after making worldwide headlines for its attack on the Church of Scientology in what they called Project Chanology. But more recently the group became a household name shortly after the WikiLeaks Cablegate debacle.
When various websites refused to host WikiLeak’s site, and credit card companies wouldn’t offer a way for people to make donations to the group, the hacktivists took it upon themselves to fight WikiLeak’s enemies. Anonymous used a series of DDoS to take down MasterCard, Visa, PayPal and drew the ire of international law authorities.
So where did Anonymous come from? The group organized via popular forum 4chan and past victims include the Church of Scientology, Internet predator Chris Forcand, and censorship proponents worldwide. Many of its actions have been motivated by the groups’ personal morals, which largely focus on freedom of information. Much of its recent work has centered on the Middle East rebellions, and the group has publicly announced its fight against Iran and Egypt. Other notable targets were HB Gary, Sony PlayStation (although Anonymous claimed innocence for the PSN collapse), and Bank of America.
The group’s various press releases and announcements are typically well written and almost business-like, as have been its denials. It has often had to defend itself against many groups claiming to be hacked by Anonymous. There have been rumors of inner turmoil that has led to different factions with separate agendas and personalities. At the moment, AnonNews is down due to DDoS attacks.

LulzSecLulzSec

If Anonymous is the student body president of hackers, LulzSec is the class clown. The group hasn’t been on the public scene very long, first gaining notoriety about a month ago when attacked Fox.com in retaliation for calling the rapper Common “vile.” But LulzSec’s first breakthrough performance came when it hacked PBS and posted a fake report that Tupac Shakur was alive. The group claimed that this was in response to negative attention directed toward WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning. LulzSec also claimed responsibility for some of Sony’s hacked web properties. Over the last month, LulzSec has also hit the FBI, Nintendo, and the CIA websites.
Despite some of its very serious and established opponents, LulzSec has time and time again affirmed it’s “in it for the lulz.” The group has also been extremely communicative with the public via its Twitter feed and even a phone request line, where it will take suggestions for hacks. The group has more of a prankster air to it then serious freedom defender, although its beliefs seem to align with Anonymous’. LulzSec has taking to mocking its victims more openly and in a more lighthearted tone than Anonymous has, though, giving it an entirely different reputation than its more serious counterpart.

Anonymous vs. LulzSec?

There were rumors that Anonymous and LulzSec were opponents. After a series of DDoS attacks that slowed down various online games because of malicious traffic, some frustrated 4chan users decided to begin their own DDoS retaliation against LulzSec. The group then used its massively popular Twitter account to attack 4chan, which Anonymous took as a personal affront. By later that day, however, both had denied such a rivalry, and the two have since united for Operation Anti-Security to expose faulty handling of user data.

Web NinjasWeb Ninjas vs. Anonymous and LulzSec

It’s a good thing Anonymous and LulzSec teamed up when they did, because Web Ninjas has its eye on them. It’s rumored Web Ninjas is the home of Th3J35t3r, who took down WikiLeaks shortly after it posted its stash of confidential diplomatic cables in fall 2010. Whether or not he’s a part of the coalition, the group insists it’s working for a “safer and peaceful Internet for everyone, not some bunch of kids threatening [the] Web and trying to own it for LULZ or in the name of publicity or financial gain or anti-government agenda.” The group released a large amount of information about the alleged identities of LulzSec hackers, including their whereabouts. LulzSec has denied the seriousness and truth behind these revelations, but an associate of the group was arrested today. LulzSec downplayed the amount of his involvement in the group, saying he is largely inconsequential to their operations. LulzSec also released the information of someone they believe attempted to out them.

IdahcIdahc

Residing (purportedly) outside this interwoven ring of hackers is Idahc. The Lebanese hacker is reportedly an 18-year-old computer science student and runs a one-man operation seemingly focused on Sony and Sony alone. He personally has moral issues with Sony, particularly for its treatment of George “GeoHot” Hotz and has said “If you want ethics, go cry to Anonymous. True lulz fans, stay tuned in.” He is thought to be behind many if not all of the hacks to various Sony Web properties. Idahc calls himself a grey hat focused on exposing the insecurity of Sony user accounts.

Despite their claims of independence and purported ethical intentions, the very nature of the groups inspires distrust. And it’s difficult to admit that with the apprehension toward supporting what are legally cyber-criminals, comes some sort of interest mixed with understanding: Whether or not you agree with all of their ploys, combating oppressive regimes and censorship while also exposing the careless liberties large corporations is difficult to oppose. Of course if you’re one of the many who’s had their email and password plastered all over PasteBin recently, you might feel otherwise.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/identifying-the-hacktivists-of-the-emerging-cyberwar/

Layer 7 Application attacks - (DDoS)


Security attacks are moving ‘up the stack.’  90% of security investments are focused on network security, yet according to Gartner, 75% of the attacks are focused at the application layer and ‘over 90 percent of security vulnerabilities exist at the application layer, not the network layer.’  SQL Injection and XSS are #1 and #2 reported vulnerabilities and the top two from the OWASP Top 10.  Plus, from Forrester Consulting, the average loss of revenue per hour for a layer 7 DDoS attack is $220,000.  These vulnerabilities are some of the primary routes that are being exploited in many of the recent attacks.
Modern DoS attacks are distributed, diverse and cross the cavity that divides network components from application infrastructure yet many of these attacks are preventable. The problem is that organizations are using outdated network and/or desktop technology to try and protect against sophisticated application security attacks which traditional solutions like network firewalls, IPS or AV systems have little to no visibility or role. It’s like trying to protect a city against a coordinated air attack by digging trenches in the ground. Wrong band-aid for the attack vector. 

It is interesting that these attacks have been around for a while but also shows how hard it is to get protection right, especially when the attacks are blended.  Once a vector is found to deliver, a variety of exploits can be used in quick succession to find one that will work.  Most of these attacks would also have sailed invisibly through an IPS device – no offense to those solutions – they are just not designed to protect the application layer or didn’t have a signature that matched.  A unified application delivery platform with multi-layer visibility is the best way to detect and mitigate multi-layer attacks.

http://psilvas.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/cure-your-big-app-attack/

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

CIA website and FBI hacked by LulzSec




Hacking collective LulzSec has decided to stop giving online gaming sites a hard time and instead put its efforts into taking down the CIA's website and the FBI's phone network.
Last week the group managed to DDoS the CIA's homepage and along with it the FBI's phone network in Detroit.
As per usual LulzSec kept everyone updated with its hacking shenanigans on Twitter, posting on the site: "Tango down – CIA.Gov- for the lulz.".
According to reports, it wasn't just the CIA and the FBI, either - the US Senate's website was also a target, but the group failed to compromise the site.

Love hack
LulzSec has been extremely busy over the last few weeks, but it has mostly targeted gaming sites. Its Titanic Takeover Tuesday campaign saw the group hack into Eve Online, Minecraft, League of Legends and FinFisher.
Even though LulzSec seems to be infiltrating websites just to show how poor the security is, this latest wave of hacks will have the US government keeping more than a close eye on it.

 http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/cia-website-and-fbi-hacked-by-lulzsec-966715#ixzz1PzhuXoHY

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

The Explosion of Cybercrime

 
 
Cybercrime is any crime involving a computer or a network and cybercrime has increased significantly in the past decade. Most organizations value employees that have an understanding of IT security risks, and many organizations require employees to have specific security certifications. This article provides an overview of various types of cyber crime, including cyber extorsion, botnets, morophing malware, and online fraud.
Cybercrime is broadly defined as any crime involving a computer or a network. In the last decade, the amount of cybercrime has grown substantially resulting in significant losses to businesses, and lining the pockets of criminals. This article presents some information about some of the common cybercrime activities and it helps emphasize the value of IT security for any organization.
It also helps to emphasize the value organizations place on employees with IT security awareness. The (ISC)2 CISSP has become one of the top IT security certifications and many organizations seek employees with this certification for both IT jobs and managerial positions. Lower level security certifications such as CompTIA’s Security+ and the (ISC)2 SSCP are also valued by organizations. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense requires anyone with an administrative account to have at least a Security+ certification.

Cyber Extortion

In high-crime areas, extortionists have demanded payments from businesses for “protection.” If the businesses refused, the business was attacked, robbed, employees harassed, and in extreme cases, the business was burned. Of course, the extortionists actually attacked the businesses when the protection money wasn’t paid.
Extortion has made it to the cyber community. Attackers use distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks to show they can cripple Websites and corporate networks. They then demand protection payments to stop the attacks. Ron Lepofsky wrote in 2006 that the U.S. and FBI receive at least 20 new cases of cyber extortion a month. Blackmailers use various types of denial of service attacks to cripple Websites and corporate networks. They then demand protection payments to restore the service. Extortionists have demanded ransoms of more than 1 million dollars to stop the attacks. Some companies quietly pay. Others attempt to fight back.
A smaller form of cyber extortion is in the form of rogueware, or fake antivirus software. A user visits a Website and sees a popup indicating their system is infected, and encouraging them to download free software to clean their system. After the user downloads and installs the software, the rogueware reports several serious infections, but then states that the free version only scans the system, but won’t clean it. If they want to clean their system, they must pay between $49.95 and $79.95 for the full version. PandaLabs reported in 2008 that criminals were extorting approximately $34 million dollars a month from unsuspecting users. While this is bad enough in itself, the rogueware provides zero protection against actual malware, leaving the user with a false sense of security.
Additionally, many rogueware criminals include additional malware in the rogueware. For example, an added keystroke logger can capture a user’s keystrokes (such as capturing passwords for online banking accounts) and periodically send the data to the criminal. Many versions also include software to convert the computer into a zombie as part of a botnet.

Botnets

Botnets have grown to astronomical proportions over the past few years, and despite some successes, they’re still stealing money from people every day. As an example, NBC reported in 2004 how a small business in Miami was attacked. Specifically, their computer was infected with the CoreFlood virus (used in the COREFLOOD botnet) and someone transferred $90K out of their Bank of America account without their authorization to a bank in Latvia. Before this, the COREFLOOD botnet was primarily known for DDoS attacks.
Other losses from the COREFLOOD botnet include $115K from a real estate company in Michigan, $78K from a law firm in South Carolina, $151K from an investment company in North Carolina. The list goes on and on. Don’t think they’re only attacking businesses though. It’s just that when an individual’s $1,000 in savings is stolen, it isn’t as newsworthy as a loss of tens of thousands of dollars. Still, the loss of $1,000 by an individual can be devastating.
Interestingly, a report in June 2008 by Joe Stewart (Director of Malware Research, Dell SecureWorks) showed this same botnet was still in operation and the bot herders had shifted their activities from DDoS attacks, to full-fledged bank fraud. After all, they found they could get quick paydays with much less effort. At that time, they had infected over 378,000 computers and had at least one database with over 50 Gigabytes of data on hapless users around the world. The botnet had captured keystrokes and recorded bank passwords, credit card data, email passwords, social network passwords, and more.
As of February 2010, this botnet had grown to over 2.3 million infected computers with 1.8 million of the computers in the United States. Thankfully, the U. S. Department of Justice took several steps in April 2011 to take over the botnet’s command and control servers and may have succeeded in shutting this botnet down. We’ll see.
The point is botnets are thriving. Even though experts are shutting down some of the large botnets, it’s like a game of whack-a-mole. They keep popping up. In years past, malware was used to cause damage to systems such as corrupting a hard drive or system files. Today, malware is a tool often used by criminals to steal identities and hard cash from regular people just like you and me.

Morphing Malware

Malware is increasingly difficult to detect, mostly because attackers are constantly developing new methods and strategies. One common method used today is polymorphism. Malicious code within a single virus can be run through a mutation engine to create thousands of different versions of the same virus. While one version may be detected by a malware detection signature, thousands of other mutations may get past this signature until another signature is developed to detect the mutated versions.
At one point, it was recommended that you update your antivirus definitions on a weekly basis. Some experts now suggest you update it hourly. Malware vendors are constantly working on detecting new variants, updating signature files, and publishing them.
It’s also worth noting that all antivirus (AV) software is not created equal. Virus Bulletin publishes a monthly report on the effectiveness of AV products that is quite enlightening. You may think that malware products can consistently detect close to 100 percent of malware in the wild, but that is not the case. For example, this graph shows a wide scattering of products in the 60 percent to 80 percent effectiveness ranges. This equates to a grade somewhere between a B and a D. For me, I don’t want the D student protecting my bank accounts and identity.
It’s also worth pointing out that criminals have discovered the power of malware when used effectively for criminal activities. While malware was previously used to take down systems or networks just for the fun of it, criminals don’t do that today. Instead, criminals use malware to enlist zombies into their huge botnets. These zombies then engage in activities allowing the criminals to steal money from people and organizations on a grand scale.

Zero Day Vulnerabilities

Zero day vulnerabilities are those that are known to attackers, but either not known to the vendor, or the vendor has not developed and released a fix yet. While this implies that a zero day vulnerability lasts only a single day, it can actually last months before a fix is written, tested, and released.
In other words, even if you are taking steps such as keeping a system up-to-date, running AV software, and regularly updating signature files, you are still at risk from zero day vulnerabilities. Defense-in-depth procedures within an organization include a variety of other security practices to protect systems and networks to help protect them from zero day vulnerabilities.

Online Fraud

Cybersource publishes an annual fraud report on online fraud. Online fraud is fraud occurring through the Internet, such as charges on stolen credit cards, and chargebacks required by a credit card’s issuing bank. In the 2011 Online Fraud Report, Cybersource reported that losses from online fraud was about 2.7 billion dollars in 2010.
The good news is that online fraud appears to be declining. Online revenue losses due to fraud were estimated at 3.3 billion in 2009 and a peak of 4 billion in 2008. While this may look like criminals are trying less, that’s not actually the case. Instead online retailers have dedicated more and more resources to blocking cybercrime and are enjoying some success. That is if you want to call an annual loss of 2.7 billion dollars a success.

Conclusion

If you’re studying IT security certifications (such as CompTIA Security+, or the (ISC)2 SSCP or CISSP), expect your skills and your knowledge to be in high demand. Organizations using computers, and especially organizations with an online presence, are recognizing the risks to IT systems and networks. More and more organizations value individuals that understand these risks.

http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1713590